Wiki contents


2019 Learning journals
2018 Learning journals
2015 Learning journals
2014 Learning journals
2013 Learning journals

Smartsims Support Centre

Blog updates

Recently Updated

Recent updates

Recently Updated

All updates

Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

This week we received very good news from Smartsims: we would get another round of equity injection on top of the one we got 2 rollovers ago. Needing multiple injections is definitely not something to be proud of, yet we felt that we deserved the second one more than the first. If the first time we needed help was mostly because of bad decisions and poor market analysis, the second time was more because of our position in the market. After the first 6 roll-overs, we fell too far behind other teams and the money we got from the firs injection could only help us get through without going completely bankrupt. We had almost no money for investment into advertising or distribution since we used most of the equity injection to get us out of the then current liability. As a result, we struggled for 2 more rounds trying to sell whatever amount of products we had left with as much advertising and distribution as possible, which is still a long way from the amount that other firms can afford. However, we did the best we could with what we had and managed to keep our firm solvent. Our sales prediction for the two rounds were extremely precise. We sold every bike that we had in store with no lost sales. We knew how fragile our firm was since other firms could easily take us over judging from the gigantic size their firms have become. Luckily that did not happen and we were still making our own decisions with some help from Peter and smartsims support team.

As we move towards the last weeks of the semester and also my 3 year degree in Auckland University, I have come to reflect on my individual development. Christensen (2010) stresses the importance of having a purpose in life and working towards it with a long term plan in mind. I Couldn't agree more with the author's perspective. Once the strategy is formed, it becomes so much easier to work towards the outcome with the focus of meeting the goals that you have set up. Anything that goes against your goals should be treated as distraction and too much distraction could steer you into the wrong direction. Allocation of resources is also one of the key points that the author talks about. I could relate this largely to my experience in Mgmt 300. Resources does not necessarily mean money, it could be man power, time, energy. If all of these factors are accounted for and distributed in a suitable manner, efficiency would come naturally. My team dealt with some issues regarding meeting time since most members in the groups are extremely busy. The solution that we came up with is to discuss mostly on facebook and only meet once a week for up to 2 hours to get all decisions confirmed and approved by all members before we put them in the simulation. We have had great connection and every member is happy with the meeting timetable. For the last weeks, we knew what we needed to do for Mike's Bikes, so we succeeded in reducing meeting time to roughly 1 hour and a half a week and still got everything done to the best of our ability and the situation our firm is in. Therefore, we had more time to spend on writing and polishing our journals to get ready for the summative journal which takes up 80% of the course and is obviously the most important component of the course. I believe that such allocation of resources is sensible.

Christensen, C. M. (2010). How will you measure your life? Harvard Business Review, 88(7/8), 46-51.


  1. Overall I can see that you definitely have engaged with this weeks readings and have shown points of your learning this week throughout this reflection. The main context of your discussion is a very interesting topic, however you could definitely expand on a few of your points such as 'having a purpose in life' to strengthen your journal. Following Daudelins guidelines is something that I have to admit is not as easy as it sounds but this structure could evidently have helped bring your points to flow together better. Punctuation and spelling is great and the quality of writing is of a good standard. Minor changes to the structure of this journal would definitely take this from being a good journal to a great journal. It is great to hear your team is looking to turn things round in the next rollover and I wish you guys all the best in the last part of the course! all the best and goodluck 

  2. Hi again,

    Last week I gave advice on following Daudelin’s framework for learning; it seems that you have not followed my advice again so I question the value of my feedback for your writing. If you do not agree with this structure you could write about it showing why you don’t use it as that would make for interesting work. Once again as a result of not really follow the articulating a specific problem, there is little analysis in your work.

    Like the piece of feedback above says, you have engaged in the readings well which is cool, knowing how you will apply them would make for interesting writing Now that you have learnt the importance of key resource allocation is there anything you would do differently in the course? Best of luck for your summative journal and again for this week’s double rollover.

    1. ; it seems that you have not followed my advice again so I question the value of my feedback for your writing.

      That is disappointing when you put the effort in, isn't it.

  3. Both Jessica Crewe-Brown and Mich Atkins-Lam  have given you good advice (and by the sounds of it, the same advice as last time). So, I wonder why you have not taken it on board.

    As side from their comments—which I agree with—I think that you need to focus on you  and your actions (and learning) rather than what the team is doing

    we had more time to spend on writing and polishing our journals to get ready for the summative journal which takes up 80% of the course and is obviously the most important component of the course.

    But without good quality (weekly) learning journals upon which to base it, doing a good summative learning journal is difficult.