Wiki contents

Journals

2019 Learning journals
2018 Learning journals
2015 Learning journals
2014 Learning journals
2013 Learning journals

Blog updates

Recently Updated

Recent updates

Recently Updated

All updates

Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

Coming back from our lovely break week 7 faced us with a new challenge in out mikes bikes simulation. The country our organisation is placed in China is in big trouble with a few companies struggling big time to stop their complete failure. This would mean a lack of expansion in the market so that teams that are currently doing well won't be able to continue to expand and increase shareholder value into the future. This lead to a dilemma faced by teams that were doing well, as a need for them to help the teams not doing so well is created. However they also don't want them to  become really good and competitive to a point where they would be able to get a better result or take away from the end result of the teams doing really well. It was decided though that it would be beneficial for all teams in the market, in the long run to help those that are not doing so well. Overall by having a larger market for bikes with some success in every team will lead to creating more success for the teams doing well currently. Meetings with CEOs were held this week and help was supposedly given to the weaker teams, or those that turned up. This however doesn't look to be as successful as hoped for with one of the teams getting a shareholder value of 1.01 after the rollover on Thursday. This links quite well into the readings for the week teaching smart people how to learn. Obviously people in these teams that are not doing well are smart but they could also be single loop learners. These type of learners are seen to block out criticism and pass blame onto others when this type of learning strategy turns bad (Argyris, 2002). This may of happened to the teams that continued to fail as they may not be taking in the criticism and advice they are given from the others teams. This to me seems incredibly foolish and actually quite frustrating when we genuinely want to help them.

 

 

Argyris, C. (2002). Teaching Smart People How to Learn. Reflections, pp. 4-15.

 

2 Comments

  1. Hey Sam, I totally agree with the situation you're in because we're obviously in the same team. In regards to giving you constructive feedback, I would probably say for you to develop your understanding of reflecting through Daudelin's four stage process. The problem you have addressed was clear and concise which I was able to understand. You have also attempted to relate the readings with analyzing your problem by talking about the weaker teams being single loop learners. You could have further expanded on this idea by testing this theory and coming up with possible ways of overcoming the lack of commitment these lower teams have. There were also some minor punctuation errors, but overall good learning journal (smile) 

  2. Hello Sam, you have indicated the problem quite well in your learning journal. I would say maybe include some possible solution or an action plan to adjust this problem, like you have mentioned these teams are in a single loop learning routine, perhaps list some possible action that would benefit their situation and so the could move onto the double loop learning routine. As such you can reflect on problems through Daudelin's four stage learning process.

    Overall, good job on your learning journal! Keep it up!