Wiki contents


2019 Learning journals
2018 Learning journals
2015 Learning journals
2014 Learning journals
2013 Learning journals

Smartsims Support Centre

Blog updates

Recently Updated

Recent updates

Recently Updated

All updates

Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

After that unexpected yet juicy issue on Monday, things are getting really interesting. Not only within the course as a whole, but also within teams. But my main issue here is what is the real definition of Leadership? After Reading Collins article about Level 5 Leadership, it sort of contradicts what I think (well what I thought) leadership was all about. Collins described it as the highest level of leadership that each organisation needs to ensure success. He also talks about how if a organisation has a level 5 leader, not only will the organisation succeed, but it will be able to maintain its success for a long period of time compared to a level 1,2,3 or 4 leaders (2005). The most interesting idea presented from this article is the word 'humility'. As a minority, humility plays a very important role within my life. In my first year in university I was told that this characteristic can be a benefit and a downfall for my success. In order to land a job, you have to talk yourself up. You have to put yourself out there. But my background tells me otherwise, talking yourself up is disrespectful. Which is why I believe I sort of doubt myself most of the times. Then Collins tells me that it is a vital quality that a leader should possess. This makes things more confusing. Initially, I was told that in order to get your foot in the door, you have to learn to always talk about how good you are. You have to take pride in yourself. Which I see most leaders have, but quiet and shy was never within my list of leadership qualities. When I took my first leadership role, I had to change from being shy and quiet to outgoing and confident. It was challenging and time consuming, but it was satisfying at the end. So from my past leadership experiences, this theory does not really make sense. It just makes things more complicated. This brings me back to a leadership lecture last year in management 211 class. Our lecturer opened with saying that there is no clear definition of leadership. Everyone has there own values and ideas, therefore their own definitions of this topic. She also mentioned that it is still a role that is hard to be defined. So, on that note, there is no real definition of leadership. Do I agree with Collins theory? Well, realistically, there might be a possibility, but I am not a 100% sure. I think that it could only be defined through our experiences.


Collins, J. C. (2005). Level 5 leadership: the triumph of humility and fierce resolve. Harvard Business Review, 83(7/8), 136--146


  1. It is very interesting to see your perspective of leadership and I think its very important to approach what is more idealistic to you. This is an excellent critique! Your learning journal is easy to understand and well presented, straightforward with your ideas and views on what you have learnt this week. Great job!

  2. Very logical set of critical thinking in this review. This demonstrates a clear understanding of the theory through higher level thinking. It is good to see the author tackle this weeks readings with skepticism as I happen to agree with the fact that there is no perfect style of leadership and everyone can develop their own styles and result in success.

    The only criticism I can effectively give is to implement the use of paragraphs to highlight the beginning and end of a topic as this habit will help drastically in essay/report writing.

    Other than that, it developed ideas logically and clearly; making for an interesting review. Well done!

  3. I like how easy to read your reflection is and it reaches a deeper understanding of the course material. The only advice I would give you is to lay out your paragraphs so your problem and solution are really clear (smile)