Wiki contents

Journals

2019 Learning journals
2018 Learning journals
2015 Learning journals
2014 Learning journals
2013 Learning journals

Smartsims Support Centre

Blog updates

Recently Updated

Recent updates

Recently Updated

All updates

Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

One problem that I identified within myself this week during classes was my tendency to doubt myself when faced with external pressure regarding answers for our work. This became apparent when Peter entered our workspace during the workshop hours to ask us a few probing questions about the decisions we had made / were planning on making.

The process of making decisions within our Mikes Bikes simulation can often be one which takes several hours and involves some quite interesting debates regarding the merits and downfalls of particular strategies. It can therefore be surprisingly irritating, albeit constructive, when someone comes in with an outside perspective and completely throws a spanner in the works. This week as in previous sessions of the workshops we have been asked a series of carefully phrased questions by Peter that consequentially made us review our entire strategy. The question is, was this a good or bad thing? Is doubting yourself when faced with external pressure at all bad? Was it a waste of time to review our decisions or helpful for us to perhaps reconsider some of the more nuanced choices?

I hypothesis that this type of questioning can indeed aid us in improving and developing our thoughts and strategies in the foreseeable future as we continue exploring the simulation. Often when making decisions as a group in an intense environment it can be easy to lose track of the choices you can make as a whole. I noticed that whenever Peter questioned our decision making we approached issues with renewed vigour and from different angles. This helped us refine our decision process and as such was ultimately a good thing.

Next week I think it may be helpful if our group as individuals each play a similar role to what Peter did for us in recent weeks. The occasional person interjecting with a question that may seem entirely random, but in reality playing more of a devils advocate role… Where these questions initiate a change in outlook on the issues at hand and allow us to improve our choices beyond what they may have otherwise been. It may just be a matter of time to see whether this has any affect on our decision making process whatsoever. 

 


2 Comments

  1. Hi Tom,

    Good job on your learning journal, it was an very interesting read. I liked how you identified specific problems and why it was that. Your recommendations for next week also seem like a good place to start to try improve your learning.
    However, I suggest you do APA referencing throughout your journal as well as include a reference list as this is part of the requirement for our learning journals.
    Overall, keep up the good work and hope the best for you and your team!
    Sabrina

  2. Hi Tom,

    I have thoroughly enjoyed reading your journal and how honest it is. It is evident that you have been able to identify areas of improvement and seem to have constructed a good way in which to do so for future meetings to come. 

    I would agree with Sabrina when encouraging the use of references throughout your journal. The readings provided to us are quite useful in developing your own understanding and provide a good basis for tackling challenges you may face. This would be beneficial when ultimately writing your summative learning journal as it would give you valuable resources to draw from. 

    Good luck and I hope to read more in the future!

    Sanara