Wiki contents


2019 Learning journals
2018 Learning journals
2015 Learning journals
2014 Learning journals
2013 Learning journals

Smartsims Support Centre

Blog updates

Recently Updated

Recent updates

Recently Updated

All updates

Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

Davenport (2006) outlines that analytic competitors must have the right focus, right culture, and right people - however, unfortunately my teams MikesBikes results are not turning out numbers that reflect this analysis made by Davenport.

This has led me to question why, I feel like my team is made up of a perfect group, so is our fault in our focus or culture? I believe that we have lost sight of our focus to some extent. In the past we have been doing well, and we lost sight of our competencies as we tried to take the next step up, specifically, in the quality of our bikes. In an attempt to cut costs, we decreased the inspection times of the bikes and this had a hugely, and unexpected, negative impact on our SHV. Unfortunately, we now have to recover from this.

Davenport (2006) would describe this lost of competency as a fault in predictive modelling, which is a loss of the most profitable customer base. However the question now becomes how do we get back to where the team was. 

 Specifically, we as a team probably need to invest a bit more time in really ironing out what is working, and what is not. We need to cut out what isn't working, and focus on the core that got us to our original SHV of around $30. Applying the predictive modelling Davenport (2006) discussed more effectively, so that we can become more analytical competitors. I believe that we may not know enough about what exactly the figure we enter into MikesBikes mean, and in order to recover we need to (more than ever) come to a more broad and complete understanding of this. Until then, it is a largely guess work.

This has been a learning curve, and Ayrgis (1982), a reading I utilised last week continues in its relevance in outlining the difference between "learning" and "development". Development being a long term learning curve that my team is in the midst of. However as the term comes to a close, this is an increased pressure to right our wrongs and get back on track before the final rollover. 


Davenport, T. H. (2006). Competing on analyticsHarvard Business Review, 84(1), 98--107.


  1. Hi Taneria,

    From going back and reading your journal in week 04 to what you have produced now I can see a huge improvement.

    I see that the feedback I gave you back in week 04 you have taken to it. Not only is your journal on time (as I noted not many CEOs would hand in late work to their directors), but also the quality of your work has increased. I have also come to understand that your problem for the week was...

    is our fault in our focus or culture?

    ... I too feel the same with my group, we have a great culture and everyone gets along with each others, however our focus can lack which may impact on results.

    It was also great to see how you linked last weeks readings into this week as I feel this will be crucial for the summative learning journal.

    Apart from the above points you have produced a really good, short and sharp journal. A small minor aspect you could improve is to include your readings by Daudelin and Ayrgis, and incorporate them separately into paragraphs rather than having small one sentence paragraphs.  I.e. Para 1 could have been used together with Para 2, and the same for Para 3 and 4.

    Well done and good luck for final few weeks (smile)


  2. Hi Taneria,

    I was meant to comment on your past journal, but I don't think I've been assigned to as I went past your previous entries and couldn't find my commentary. With that aside, I found your journal well written your analysis of the readings was well incorporated with examples from class e.g. Davenport culture to your groups current work ethic. I like how you managed to bring in other readings as well which will help your summative learning journal.

    The only thing you could improve on is bringing in Blooms Taxnomy & Daudelin into your journal, other than that a great read (smile).