Wiki contents

Journals

2019 Learning journals
2018 Learning journals
2015 Learning journals
2014 Learning journals
2013 Learning journals

Smartsims Support Centre

Blog updates

Recently Updated

Recent updates

Recently Updated

All updates

Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

Week 5 – it is the first week in which the rollover counts. 11:59am Thursday 22 August was the moment in truth where your standpoint within the marketplace determines whether you:

  1. Had a strategy at all
  2. Had a strategy but failed or
  3. Had a strategy that will allow you to further compete competitively within the mikes bikes world.

As I sit down to write this reflection, hurriedly rushed due to a week full of assignments and deadlines, I contemplate whether the decision to read the readings after our group had got together and decided our strategy (admittedly I realise the need for readings before class, however this week it was nearly impossible for me to have achieved that). One reading in particular stood out for me this week both in terms of its relevance to the mikes bikes simulation and the case in which it helps portray its point.  The Blue Ocean Strategy by Kim & Mauborgne (2004) talked about the advantages that Circ de Solei created and used in order to catch a different segment of the market. I felt that this for me bought up several questions that I feel myself and the team left out when discussing the strategy before the rollover. The theory around the known market space and the unknown market space, makes me start to question the strategy we put in place for the first rollover. While the effects of the market after the first rollover put us in prime position to increase, the idea of striving to reach the blue ocean sounds even more appealing. The way in which we are striving to beat the competition and always be ahead of them, from the readings perspective skews what we are actually trying to achieve which is capitalisation (and lots of it). The dilemma in terms of applying this reading to the application of the mikes is the the possibility to apply the ¿new market scenario¿ to the 5 segments within mikes bikes.  This links to the the other readings where strategy and business models are key to the success of the mikes bikes business as a whole. I feel that that although our group as a whole discussed an planned for a strategy, was it in the end just a business model that was always going to be flawed (Kim, & Mauborgne, 2002; Magretta, 2002). As I ponder this I start to reflect on what was said in the first couple of weeks clasess and also the previous readings and I start to think that, although this first rollover was not desired for our group, it is the need to look at the long term and not the next roll over but the one after in order to secure our position within the market of mikes bikes. I understand that a business model is different to the strategy, and my mission for the week ahead is to ensure that we as a team and a successful business (Magretta, 2002)

Kim, W. C. & Mauborgne, R. (2002). Charting your company¿s future. Harvard Business Review, 80(6), 76--83
Kim, W. C. & Mauborgne, R. (2004). Blue ocean strategyHarvard Business Review, 82(10), 75--84
Magretta, J. (2002). Why business models matterHarvard Business Review, 80(5), 86--92

2 Comments

  1. Well done on capturing some of the key points from the readings. As you mentioned in your first sentence, you felt rushed in writing this journal. I think that this comes across somewhat in your writing style. In saying that you've covered off some great content and thoughts around your teams strategy and what you can do differently. I agree that looking at the long term strategy will be key to success. My only suggestion for improvement next week is for you to take sometime to order your thoughts before you start writing your journal. Best of luck. 

  2. I found that I can analyse the readings and the problems at hand, however need to synthesis my own problems in order to gain higher levels on blooms taxonomy. I need to go more in depth and pull apart my problem to uncover what i really want to fix and how i am going to go about and do that. This weeks journal is only at the articulation stage of Daudelins (1996)as it fails to look deep into the problem and doesn't really go about fixing it. I need to sit down and really concentrate on the problems to fix and focus on that one thing in the learning journal, this will allow me to at least reach the synthesis level of blooms taxonomy (Nentl, N., & Zietlow, 2008). 

    Another suggestion for myself would be to put more of my thoughts and opinions from the reading into the journal to critically evaluate the points and really fix the problems that are being experienced.

    Overall there needs to be more effort put into the framework in which the blogs should be written in order to uncover the themes and really involve myself in fixing the problems at hand.

    Daudelin, M. W. (1996). Learning from experience through reflectionOrganizational Dynamics, 24(3), 36--48
    Nentl, N., & Zietlow, R. (2008). Using bloom's taxonomy to teach critical thinking skills to business studentsCollege & Undergraduate Libraries, 15(1-2), 159--172. doi:10.1080/10691310802177135