Wiki contents

Journals

2019 Learning journals
2018 Learning journals
2015 Learning journals
2014 Learning journals
2013 Learning journals

Blog updates

Recently Updated

Recent updates

Recently Updated

All updates

Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

At first knowing that this week would be my last journal reflection ever really set my mind at ease. Excluding the 3000 word summative journal, I thought would never have to reflect on my learning each week again. Although when I think about it, I don’t think I will be able to stop reflecting ever again after this. Maybe I wont do it in such a formal manner, like writing down my thoughts. But I have most definitely gotten into the habit of mulling over my actions and considering what I have learnt after this Mikes Bikes experience. Interestingly enough this whole reflective process has made me more aware and shown me how looking back can give you ideas how to move forward.

 

Without the need to reflect I doubt my team would have done so well. By going back and looking at the problems and faults in our strategies we were able to fix anything we had wrong. The whole point of Daudelin’s process of reflection and learning was to identify and solve problems by going back over them in your head to improve yourself. I feel I have really gained the ability to do this after being required to write a journal every Friday, much to my annoyance sometimes. Yet realistically it has been the key to our successful performance.

 

Now that the journals are nearly over I do understand their importance, Daudelin found ‘ that one hour spent reflecting can significantly increase learning’ (Daudelin, p. 45). And I completely agree with this statement. If we hadn’t consciously evaluated our problems we wouldn’t have been able to find solutions and make better decisions. Critical analysis has never been more helpful and necessary to play this game, without reflecting I feel a team would be blindly fumbling in the market.

 

In the reading ‘How will you measure your life’ by C. Christensen a point that stood out for me was when he talked about creating a culture. He was talking about how managers knowing ‘what tools to wield to elicit the needed cooperation is a critical managerial skill’ (Christensen, 2010, p.50). He also felt these tools were needed more or less depending on how willing employees agreed on their participation in an organization and how much they agreed upon the actions needed to produce the desired results. He talked about ‘power tools’ being threats, punishment and coercion. Yet if an organization embraces procedures and knows its priorities then culture has been created. I feel very lucky that in my team we skipped any need for coercive power tools and went straight on to shared culture. As there was no manager from the start we all knew what we wanted to achieve together and what was expected of others. And so we drew up a contract and all understood our responsibilities.

 

 Our culture helped us solve problems and reflect on them each week together. Christensen felt ‘ culture in compelling but unspoken ways, dictates the proven, acceptable methods by which members of the group address recurrent problems’ (Christensen, 2010, p. 50). I agree with him that this was a key aspect, which helped my team through its Mikes Bikes journey. I realize its not over yet and we still have the double rollover, but I still think if we keep reflecting like Daudelin wanted us to and we actively continue to embrace our culture. I think we will have done the best we can.

 

References:

 

Christensen, C. M. (2010). How will you measure your life? Harvard Business Review, 88(7/8), 46-51.

 

Daudelin, M. W. (1996). Learning from experience through reflection. Organizational Dynamics, 24(3), 36--48

2 Comments

  1. Hey Jade

    I’m glad you have related to Daudelin’s reading in this journal and realized the purpose of doing the journal. As a reader, I can vaguely feel you know what you are going to write for your summative journal; is a good thing.

    You have done a great job in summarizing the reading and applied it to your team experience. From your previous and this week’s journal, I think you need to show you are able to think of other dimensions of the problem. For example, you could write about what could be done, will it be appropriate, the pros&cons of the possible solution. I hope this would help you in doing your summative journal.

    Good luck :)

  2. Hi Jade

    I like how you've applied the readings to how your team has managed to do well; focussing on what has been your key to success. I do think you could have expanded a bit more on some of the interesting points - for example, you say that the point of Daudelin's process was to "improve yourself" - do you think this has happened? Has your behaviour changed because of MGMT300, and will it stay changed?

    In terms of the summative, I'd recommend following Daudelin's structure a little closer (although perhaps you haven't for this one just because it's simply like a "looking back" journal, which is understandable). Also, remember that it's about you and your learning, not necessarily the team's.

    Hope this is helpful, and all the best for your summative! (smile)