Wiki contents

Journals

2019 Learning journals
2018 Learning journals
2015 Learning journals
2014 Learning journals
2013 Learning journals

Smartsims Support Centre

Blog updates

Recently Updated

Recent updates

Recently Updated

All updates

Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

Monday's lecture gave a good indication that our team needed to come up with a good strategy to have the competitive advantage needed in our world. Kim & Mauborgne (2004) states to be able to make a blue ocean strategy is making competition irrelevant. This was particular important for our team because based on the practise roll overs, we strategized how we needed to be on top. This put lots of stress in our upcoming decisions and more doubts into questions of what ifs. For the first practice roll over our team was at the top, which gave us a huge motivation to maintain our position and fix any mistakes necessary for our second roll over. However our competitive instinct got the better of us and result was not as good on the second roll over. This was because we copied our competitor¿s movements. Based on the article it has created a red strategy were the competition was intense in one market and nobody utilise other markets that was available. This has created many loss sales for our team.

Learning from our mistakes, we propose some strategies and realise competition did not matter. What mattered was how well we executed our plans and strategy. When the offline mode was removed, we couldn't practice our new strategy. This was a huge risk for our team by doing something we haven't tried before.  Our strategy was utilising the markets many competitors didn¿t go into before.  Having the knowledge of the perceptual map helped us greatly in understanding how to target our customers better. This in turn has developed a better strategy than we had before. It was a better strategy because if every competitor gone in the middle of the perceptual map, our consumer capture rate would have not been high. Therefore we would have not dominated majority of the consumer market. This was the reason why we failed in our practice roll overs, in that we did not understand the perceptual map and how it related to the opportunities in creating a competitive advantage.

Kim & Mauborgne (2004) talked about pursuing differentiation and low cost together for developing a blue ocean strategy.  However when we dropped our price, our consumer perception of our bike was a low quality product. This brought up questions that in order for some bikes to have the perception of high quality, at what point do we drop the price? The reason could have been we have not established a customer based large enough to drop our prices. In saying this, if we drop our price after a few roll overs our consumers might think there is something faulty. Therefore the blue ocean strategy might not work if consumers have develop a perception of high quality base on price.

Kim, W. C. & Mauborgne, R. (2004). Blue ocean Strategy. Harvard Business Review, 82(10), 75--84

3 Comments

  1. Hay great journal seem like you have put a lot of thought into your strategy as a team. I am wondering if you read the other two reading this week.

     I read all three and found the other two that you have not referenced really helpful and they offered a lot of questions, so I would recommend reading if you get the chance.

    Maybe to further the reflection process you could offer solutions for your teams actions or strategic direction in the future?

  2. Thank you for the opportunity to review your journal. The main thing of which you demonstrated learning is applying the knowledge that was learned from the theory to the team experiences.

    The degree in which you followed Daudeline¿s guideline shows that there is an identification of the problem and coming up with hypothesis in solving the problem. This was demonstrated in ¿When the offline mode was removed, we couldn't practice our new strategy. This was a huge risk for our team by doing something we haven't tried before. Our strategy was utilising the markets many competitors didn¿t go into before. Having the knowledge of the perceptual map helped us greatly in understanding how to target our customers better. This in turn has developed a better strategy than we had before. It was a better strategy because if every competitor gone in the middle of the perceptual map, our consumer capture rate would have not been high. Therefore we would have not dominated majority of the consumer market.¿ This shows the basis of the problem is not understanding the perceptual map which lead to sale loss and having an understanding and applying this knowledge have increased the chance of a positive outcome. The journal was based mostly on trial and error to having a solution to the problem.

    The highest level on the Bloom¿s hierarchy that was demonstrated is analysis. This is because there was an understanding and explanation of why a particular solution will solve the problem such as understanding the perceptual map leading to better outcome in sales.

    Things to improve on is having an evaluation and synthesis on the solutions to demonstrate the outcome of application of the action. Based on the Bloom¿s hierarchy, having a criteria shows whether the potential solution works or not. This in turn can lead to other critical questions into why such solution did not work and expanding the thinking into other solutions that have not appeared in the original thinking. By having a criteria means the potential solution will be more in depth and closely related to achieving what it is supposed to achieve, rather not having a criteria will have endless possible solutions in which some does not relate into solving the problem.

    Thanks for sharing your journal and your work has helped to improve my understanding of how I can develop my understanding of theories and how to flow on from the suggestions made by Daudeline.

  3. sorry only just read the instructions