Wiki contents

Journals

2019 Learning journals
2018 Learning journals
2015 Learning journals
2014 Learning journals
2013 Learning journals

Blog updates

Recently Updated

Recent updates

Recently Updated

All updates

Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

After originally being  pleasantly surprised to see I had been given the marketing role which was my first choice. I was also pleased to meet my team and see that they did not evoke any of the concerns raised in our class discussion about teams and what the Oakley reading went into. We still followed the suggestions from Peter and the Oakley reading which recommended establishing expectations and avoiding problems by creating a team contract to encourage mutual accountability as mentioned by Katzenbach.

After meeting with the group and developing a mission statement and the beginnings of a strategy, I am slightly concerned our team will do exactly what we are warned not to do by the "Leadership Run Amok" reading. We are warned not to be primarily focussed on achievement because of its effect of diminishing trust and confidence in team members, ultimately damaging potential performance. In this highly competitive environment created by the Mike's Bikes simulation competing with other team and in such a short game (compared to real life business) I think it will be difficult to focus on people instead of what we want to achieve ultimately. I suppose it comes down to what our CEO's motivations are, whether he is driven by achievement, affiliation, personal power or social power. At this stage it is too early to see what motivates our leader, I hope he has characteristics of socialised power to empower the whole team perfection.

It may be optimistic to ask for a level 5 leader as defined by Collins, but in the Mike's Bikes simulation it is exactly what we need. A leader that is willing to take risks, has genuine humility and intense professional will (Collins, 2005) will be the perfect leader to navigate the tricky terrain ahead that is the Mike's Bikes simulation. A leader that will support and praise the team will drive our success and push us to take risks. It will be interesting to see how well the concept of level 5 leader will play out in this context with such close knit teams whose CEOs are more like team members with more authority - a different dynamic to which the level 5 leader theory was developed for. Also the peer reviews may skew the behaviour of CEOs into being less risk takers are more accomodative to team members' suggestions.

I now have a new perspective of the leader and follower relationship, and I am interested to see how these theories can be applied once our team has settled into routine and habit and how this plays out for us In terms of the results we are all able to achieve. 

References:

Collins, J. C. (2005). Level 5 leadership: the triumph of humility and fierce resolve. Harvard Business Review, 83(7/8),136---146.

Katzenbach, J. R. & Smith, D. K. (1992). Why teams matter. McKinsey Quarterly, (3), 3---27.

1 Comment

  1. I agree with your point that the Mike's Bike simulation is such a short game comparing to the real business situation. You never know about what happen next in the real world. However the purpose of the simulation is to give us a clue of what it is like actually. The practice round is to get us familiar with the game so we can act more fluent for the real competing rounds. Regarding to the readings this week, there are lots of different kkinds of perspectives of proper leadership. I think it would be effective as long as the leader can really motivate followers and be able to get full potential out of them. Overall this learning journal is written fluently and I can see your points easily. This writing will be more complete if you can give examples and demonstrate them.