Wiki contents


2019 Learning journals
2018 Learning journals
2015 Learning journals
2014 Learning journals
2013 Learning journals

Smartsims Support Centre

Blog updates

Recently Updated

Recent updates

Recently Updated

All updates

Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

This week in class was like no other that I have experienced. Acting as the CEO of my Mike's Bikes team, I was thrust into a meeting consuming almost all of the Tuesday lecture time with my team. However, it was time which I (and I believe all involved) considered quite valuable. As we are all aware, the process in which the Mike's Bikes teams were formed was undermined by those at the helm. In dealing with this, those involved got a true taste of what it is to be an effective leader and dealing with strategic problems. Whichever way the problem was remedied, someone lost out. Essentially we were faced with a paradox. In dealing with the issue I quickly realised that, as per Collins (2001), that was not the only paradox that I had to balance in being a team leader. Collins (2001) notes that a "Level 5" leader must "build enduring greatness" essentially through balancing personal humility an professional will. I had to find a balance between getting the job done professionally and effectively, while also ensuring I was calm and collected when things didn't go to plan. My goal was to channel ambition into my team, and not into myself (Collins, 2001). 

Furthermore, Collins (2001) notes that there are levels beneath "5" that must also be satisfied, in order to achieve greatness, with respect to company leadership. However it is this personal drive and ambition which generally is at odds with the humility required to reach the 5th level. My team is fantastic, and we all want to do well, we are passionate and I need to channel this into effective results, while maintaining humility, and a level-head if things head off-track. 

Kelley (1988) notes that good leaders know how to follow, and they set an example for others. This I believe is very true, and I will use this as my goal for the coming week. Having had the first rollover, my team knows that there are a few changes that need to be remedied, however at the same time we had great successes in parts of the rollover that I did not expect. Had I exercised my own opinion over everything and not followed and trusted the research that the team had done, we would have certainly ended in a different place, and worse off.



Collins, J. C. (2005). Level 5 leadership: the triumph of humility and fierce resolveHarvard Business Review, 83(7/8), 136–146

Kelley, R. E. (1988). In praise of followers. Harvard Business Review, 66(6), 142--148


  1. You labelled this as "Week03". I assume you meant "Week04", so I changed it.

  2. Hi Taniera,

    My understanding is that your learning journal I am about to give feedback for is meant to be for week 03 and not week 04, but please do correct me if I am wrong. 

    Yes I agree with you that how the teams were formed may have been biased, but putting this aside and moving on I feel that your learning journal didn't reflect the four stage process of what you have learnt, or a problem you are facing by Marilyn Daudelin. You have paraphrased quotes in each paragraph from both readings and shown how they have impacted you whilst taking Mgmt 300. This is a good starting point, but needs to be expanded when you are writing your journal. Merely stating about level 5 leadership and I quote from your journal "my team is fantastic, and we all want to do well, we are passionate and I need to channel this into effective results, while maintaining humility, and a level-head if things head off-track", is not enough. Further explain to readers how your team want to do well by giving examples of figures from your roll-overs and expectations. Examples are vital so that readers can grasp a better grip on your journal.

    As a CEO and talking about Level 5 it could be a good idea to show more ownership to your work and then portraying this onto your team. For example I mean making sure your work is done on time as this journal was late (not many CEOs would hand back late work to their directors/ board), and you haven't done a journal for this week. Maybe a bit of time management will help with your goal you set out at the end of paragraph one "to channel ambition into my team, and not into myself."

    If you do ever need help don't be afraid to talk to Peter, he is a wonderful lecturer and wants to help out all of his students.

    All the best for your team and coming journals


  3. I found your journal lacked structure as it jumped from one point to another which made it hard to follow.
     Also when using theory in their journals, most people use it to label things; e.g., Mary is an effective follower. Very few (if any) people are using theory to either explain what is happening, or predict what might happen. (PETER'S ADVICE ON THE JOURNALS). Overall, it was well written