Wiki contents
Journals
2019 Learning journals
2018 Learning journals
2015 Learning journals
2014 Learning journals
2013 Learning journals
Blog updates
Recently Updated
-
- updated 25 Oct, 2019
- view change
-
- created 24 Oct, 2019
-
- created 22 Oct, 2019
-
- created 17 Oct, 2019
-
- created 10 Oct, 2019
Recent updates
Recently Updated
-
- updated 05 Nov, 2019
- view change
-
- updated 29 Oct, 2019
- view change
-
- updated 25 Oct, 2019
- view change
-
- commented 25 Oct, 2019
-
- commented 25 Oct, 2019
-
- updated 25 Oct, 2019
- view change
-
- created 24 Oct, 2019
-
- commented 24 Oct, 2019
-
- commented 24 Oct, 2019
-
- commented 24 Oct, 2019
2 Comments
Phillippa Wood
Your journal started to touch on an interesting point and I think if you had developed this further it would have been a very strong journal. I think it is lacking depth and you could have achieved this if you mentioned a little bit more about how your team entered this problem, what things you could have done differently in hindsight (ie what you would do now if you had to repeat the Mikes Bikes simulation, knowing what you now know from the readings) and also potentially how this learning is relevant to the future. Hope this helps for the summative learning journal!
Tayla Sumner
Hi John, it is good to see that you have used the concepts in the readings to help you get to the problem you have faced this week, however i feel that your journal and learning would benefit if you were to closely follow Daudelin's process.This would have helped you to format your reflection in a way that would have lead to a solution. It is important to reflect on why you decided to invest so heavily in the first place, and what you're going to do next. The lack of depth in your journal indicates that you are at the lower levels of Blooms Taxonomy however i believe that you have the potential to move higher by following Daudelin's process . I hope this hasn't come across too negative! All the best for your summative journal!