Wiki contents


2019 Learning journals
2018 Learning journals
2015 Learning journals
2014 Learning journals
2013 Learning journals

Smartsims Support Centre

Blog updates

Recently Updated

Recent updates

Recently Updated

All updates

Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

Leadership, Followership, Teamwork and Belonging


The readings from this week lead me to reflect on just how the structure of my team impacted us as team members and the rolls we fell into. In our CV’s all six of us had specified ‘learning-oriented’ as our main goal for the semester and although achievement (in the form of an A) is indeed a goal that we are striving for, it is not our main focus – the path we take in order to reach this goal is much more than a means to an end. Perhaps this is how my group seemed to fall, primarily, into the participative style of leadership outlined in Spreier, Fontaine and Malloy’s article ‘Leadership run Amok (2006). Our CEO values and trusts the input that I and my other team members give, which falls squarely within the specifications for this particular leadership style. Questions are very common within team discussions, with our CEO often addressing each member and asking for their ideas on their departments before turning to the team and asking for a group consensus.


So far this approach to the simulation has worked well. As of the first practice roll-over our team is ranked 5th in the class. When we found this out our group Facebook page was overcome with post of congratulations and celebrations. Our hard work and collaboration had paid off and we are on the right track despite a hiccup at the beginning of the week where our SHV wouldn’t stop plummeting, so we had to take a step back, reflect and evaluate (“Why isn’t this working?” “What else can we try?” “Re-read the relevant reports and come back with fresh eyes, everyone,”) until we found a solution to our problem.


As a team I feel as though we have reached the norming stage of formation quite rabidly – we have clear, unified goals and expectations of each other, open channels of communication and a dedication to the goal – but the reason for this could be because we are, as specified in Kelley’s reading “In praise of followers,” effective followers (1998). Kelley writes, that a good follower demonstrates certain qualities; ones that, in actuality, overlap greatly with those displayed by a great leader – enthusiastic, intelligent and self-reliant participation. The individuals that make up my team hold those qualities inherently close to them; none of us are ‘sheep’ – passive and uncritical. We talk, research and have opinions, but we are also open to the thoughts of others and share a level of commitment to this project.


To us, communication is key. Each member in my group has a voice and adds value. We have only been a team for a week but already, we all belong. There is a long way to go in this project but with such a well-aligned team and a strategy that gives us the ability to have short-term flexibility, in order for us to factor in any learning curves we encounter, while still having long-term stability, I have confidence in Galaxy Bicycles and our future as a team.





Kelley, R. E. (1988). In praise of followers. Harvard Business Review, 66(6), 142--148


Spreier, S. W., Fontaine, M. H., & Malloy, R. L. (2006). Leadership run amok. Harvard Business Review, 84(6), 72--82


  1. I really enjoyed reading your review and thought it was very well written and interesting! I think you have done a good job at effectively making reference to earlier theories from the course, such as the reflective earning your team undertook in order to be successful and also to Tuckman's model. These weren't included in your references though, and might be something that you'd want to cite. Some minor adjustments could be made through the paragraphs, such as some long-winded sentences that could be cut down. An example of this is in the last paragraph where the last sentence could have a break in it somewhere. This is a minor observation however and I think you have made some very good observations through your reflection, and by the sounds of it will have a successful group! Good luck for the assessment!

  2. This is a a really good reading journal. It is one of the better ones that I have seen so far. It has great flow allowing the readers to understand the what you learned in the previous week. The thing that was really good about your reading journal was that, you incorporated the reading really well with the experiences that you had with your group. The only thing that I saw that could be fixed is the in-text referencing. Right now you are only writing the date for your in-text referencing. You should also write in the last name of the authors as well. For example, (Kelley, 1988). Other then that, greta job!