Wiki contents


2019 Learning journals
2018 Learning journals
2015 Learning journals
2014 Learning journals
2013 Learning journals

Blog updates

Recently Updated

Recent updates

Recently Updated

All updates

Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

The first thing that came to my mind when I thought of the word “team”, was the word “group” but according to this week’s readings and lectures these two words are totally different. Jon R Katzenbach and Douglas K. Smith define team as “a small number of people with complementary skills who are committed to a common purpose, performance and approach for which they hold themselves mutually accountable” (1992)……….and here I thought team was just a group of people working together, how naïve.

My whole life, I thought consisted of being in “teams” due to actively taking part in sports such as netball and being involved in club activities which required team activities. As Peter listed the many factors to take into consideration when putting a team together rather than just a group, I began to wonder whether or not the many groups I was a part of, were teams (transformed into a team) or remained as just that, a “group”.

From the readings and from Peters lecture, having the same goal or “commitment to a common purpose and performance goal” (Jon.R.K, Smith D.K, 1992) is very important in creating a successful and effective team. This is evident in my netball life as my team all started with a common purpose of winning A grade (which we successfully achieved) and also winning Premier grade. However, over time I found that even with this purpose, many of my netball team mates had external factors affecting their level of commitment to this goal e.g. family problems, school/university, church commitments etc. This meant that only half of our goal was achieved and the other half (winning Premier grade) was no longer being attempted. So does the change of goals for each individual mean my team is no longer a “team” but rather has transformed back into just a “group”? As I ask this myself this question, I wonder if there was anything I could’ve done to have prevented the declining commitment to our goal or whether or not I had no control over these factors. I guess that’s where the whole “mutually accountable” part comes in.

I don’t know whether or not knowing the difference between team and group will dramatically change my life (probably not) but I do know I am more aware of what a successful team is supposed to be like and hopefully I’ll be able to be a part of such a group in my future endeavors.



Katzenbach, J. R. & Smith, D. K. (1992). Why teams matterMcKinsey Quarterly, (3), 3--27


  1. Hello

    I liked the way you reflected on what teams meant to you in contrast with the reading. The intertwined nature of your personal thought and reading is intriguing as the reading isn't just knowledge but ideas that you dwelled upon and integrated into your schema. Just a minor thing to change would be referencing. UoA is quite strict about APA, as you would have experienced, lecturers nag all of us every semester about it and hopefully you don't miss out on marks because of it. Just that the way you referenced : (Jon.R.K, Smith D.K, 1992), is usually done (Katzenbach & Smith, 1992) in APA. Thats all otherwise good luck and I hope your netball team is more motivated and you win all your matches.

  2. Hi there, I found your journal to be understandable and relatable through your life example of playing netball.  I also thought it interesting how your reflecting led to whether team could revert back to a group, an idea I particularly had not thought of. In terms of improvement, there were a few grammar issues such as the first sentence in paragraph two and maybe shortening some sentence such as your conclusion or making them two. I encourage you to read aloud when editing to see what words may be missing or when a sentence may be drawn out.