Wiki contents

Journals

2019 Learning journals
2018 Learning journals
2015 Learning journals
2014 Learning journals
2013 Learning journals

Smartsims Support Centre

Blog updates

Recent updates

Recently Updated

All updates

Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

One problem our team had this week became apparent to me after reading through and gaining an understanding of the reading by Kim and Mauborgne (2002). It was that our team lacked a clear and concise strategy as an overarching motivator for our business decisions within Mikes Bikes. As described by Kim and Mauborgne (2002) there tends to be a lack of focus on the ‘big picture’ when it comes to strategy and strategic planning. This is something that I think is especially relevant to our group.

We had made some decisions (such as only expanding to one new market and instead redeveloping our adventurer bike) which in hindsight may have cost us an advantage in the game. These choices seemed like the right ones at the time, but perhaps we were focused too narrowly and failed to see the bigger picture of the wider simulation. Focusing on where we knew we could succeed rather than focusing on where the biggest opportunities were was probably what we did wrong here.

One thing that could aid us to avoid falling into a similar trap in the future is developing an analysing a strategic canvas of our business model and those of our competitors in line with the what was described by Kim and Mauborgne (2002). Trying to see where our strengths and differences lie and whether or not these are successful has potentially to really improve our decision making for the weeks to come.

I think that perhaps at the start of the coming weeks session we could sit down as a team and formulate a longer term, fixed concrete strategic plan following the tips from this reading. This would allow us to make decisions in a more forward, future thinking manner.

References:

Kim, W. C., & Mauborgne, R. (2002). Charting Your Company’s Future. (cover story). Harvard Business Review, 80(6), 76–83.

4 Comments

  1. Hello. 

    Good journal entry. Even though Daudelin's framework isn't used I can kinda see it in the journal. Maybe next time when writing your journal it would be good to start off with Daudelin's framework as it gives you a clear structure to use throughout the journal. Also in the journal entry adding what YOU have specifically learnt is also a good idea, not just your team. 

    Good luck and all the best 

    Flynn 

  2. Hey Tom,

    I enjoyed reading your journal and your reflection on past decisions. I agree with Flynn that I would like to hear about what you yourself have learnt from potential past mistakes. A good way to ensure this is to follow Daudelins' framework and his 4 steps, this will allow you to effectively analyse and reflect on what you have learnt this week and what you plan to do about it.

    Cheers, Ethan

    1. Hey Ethan,

      I would like to meet up and potentially discuss your review on Toms work, maybe Friday?

      Cheers Caleb


      1. Hey Caleb,

        yes, that is an acceptable date, I am free any time after 5