Wiki contents

Journals

2019 Learning journals
2018 Learning journals
2015 Learning journals
2014 Learning journals
2013 Learning journals

Blog updates

Recently Updated

Recent updates

Recently Updated

All updates

Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

After a weary few weeks where my team experienced a downfall in SHV, we have successfully risen back up. We enjoyed the highest market share and revenue this week and it is great to reap the rewards of our efforts, and even better to see such a recovery (particularly with our grades in the back of our minds). However getting to this point I am left reflecting on how we managed to get back up, while also wondering how successful we would have been had we never made the mistakes we did to fall down in the first place. 

Greiner (1972) outlines that an organisations future is dependent on its history and this struck a chord with me. Considering all that our team (and organisation) has experienced, in the long-run this will all be beneficial. Knowing what it feels like to do terribly is just as important as understanding what it takes to do well. If we were to have been consistently on top, then I feel we would become comfortable and complacent - and when the (somewhat inevitable) downfall arises, we would not be as well equipped to deal with it. 

A note that rose from readings of week 5 with me was that described as 'blue ocean' strategies (Kim et. al, 2004). These are completely new markets with no competitors, and are very lucrative. This applied particularly well to my team for a few reasons. We were the only team that produced more than one particular bike for the market. For example we had two different racers, selling at different prices and qualities, which meant that we were able to capitalise on a greater market share. Producing only one bike limits an organisation to a single line of customers. In this way we increased our market share, but also had to balance the costs of this move effectively. This is not necessarily creating a new market, but instead recognising the existence of a market and capitalising on this. 

In the end, it has been an interesting, and surprisingly helpful experience in writing these journals for the past ten weeks. It has also been a benefit to read other journals, and gain some insight into the journeys that others are enduring at the same time. With the final rollover looming, all fingers are crossed that we can keep on moving onwards and upwards.

References:

Greiner, L. E. (1972). Evolution and revolution as organizations grow. Harvard Business Review, 50(4), 37–46

Kim, W. C. & Mauborgne, R. (2004). Blue ocean strategyHarvard Business Review, 82(10), 75--84
Magretta, J. (2002). Why business models matterHarvard Business Review, 80(5), 86--92

3 Comments

  1. Hi Taneria,

    Again you have produced another great journal (like last week), compared to when I evaluated your last one in week 04. It is great to see that you have come a long way.

    In regards to the journal this week it was great to see you link in contents from week 5. This has shown me that you are able to relate all of MGMT 300 experience towards your final summative journal. You have outlined that...

    organisations future is dependent on its history

    ... This is very true and it is from your previous actions in roll-overs to get your firm where you are today. Well done for also explaining how and why organizations are dependent on its history through giving examples of your racer bike.

    On a small note, the article by Griener concentrates of evolution and revolution. It would have been nice to explain if your firm was going through these stages when increasing your SHV as outlined in paragraph 1, and if so which phase (Exhibit 2).

    Overall well done and good luck for the final few weeks of university for the year (smile)

  2. Your journal has successfully outlined a problem (shareholder value) along with a solution in launching new bikes. Which touches on Daudelin reflection process overall great read and well structured.

  3. At the end of your learning journal, I am left wonder what you (rather than your team) are going to do differently as a result of the 'lesson' you have learnt this week (from doing your learning journal). This feels more like a capstone to your weekly learning journals, and whilst I can appreciate why you would do that (and I am relatively happy that you and others have gone down that path), it makes it hard for me to give you constructive feedback.

    In your summative learning journal, you will need to emphasise what you will be doing differently after the course (and how that it better to what you were doing before the course). In other words, what is your biggest take away from the course and how do you enact that?