- created 20 Mar, 2018
Your performance in this course is assessed through two means: your summative learning portfolio and the performance of your firm. These represent group and individual assessments.
There is no final examination. As all assessment takes place prior to the examination period, this course can seem as if it has a heavier workload than those with an examination.
At the end of the course, you will evaluate the performance of your team members and this will be used to allocate individual team member's share of the team's group grade. Overall, those whom the team see as having contributed the greatest will get a larger share of group grade than those who contribute the least.
You should not underestimate the importance of the peer evaluation process, and the impact it can have on your final grade. It is entirely possible for the team to get a C and for an individual team member to end up with an A+. Likewise a team might get an A+, but an individual team member might get a D.
The table below shows the general criteria against which work is assessed. Although 'grading on the curve' is not used, it is usual that most students work falls within the B-range.
Exceptional and beyond what was expected
Polished and very good
Covers everything that was expected, comprehensive; demonstrated good understanding
Good coverage but minor flaws
Demonstrated adequate understanding of fundamentals, but some gaps
Just adequate, some problems
Just adequate, many problems
Inadequate and lack of understanding
Generally, you should be aware that: